This website uses cookies and similar technologies. We use cookies to analyse traffic and improve your experience. If you do not want the said data to be processed by us, you can always change the cookie settings in your browser or stop using this site. You can learn more from our Privacy Policy. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the processing of cookies and consent to our Privacy Policy.

Accept Close website
16 November 2016

ALEXANDER VALCHYSHEN, ICU HEAD OF RESEARCH, MET GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, THINK-TANK ECONOMISTS AND PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF INVESTMENT FUNDS IN THE US

Between 30 October and 4 November, Alexander Valchyshen, head of research of the financial group ICU, had a number of meetings in the US with government officials, think-tank economists, as well as analysts and portfolio managers of investment funds. The subject of the meetings was ICU's three-year macro forecast of Ukraine’s economy.

 

In Washington DC, meetings were held with the US Treasury representatives who cover Ukraine, its public finance development officials, and economists from the International Institute of Finance, which is a global association of the financial industry.

 

In New York, meetings were held with a number of representatives of the investment funds that deal with Ukraine's tradable securities.

 

During the meetings, ICU's macroeconomic view of Ukraine was presented along with several other important issues. Among them were: another wave of political pressure coming from opposition on the Ukraine's monetary authorities, the likely impact of the US presidential elections on Ukraine’s economy, and the prices of Ukraine's outstanding Eurobonds.

 

Valchyshen emphasized that a second wave of political pressure is coming from the opposition against Ukraine's central bank this year (the first, during April-May, failed to gather meaningful momentum). These attempts represent the resistance of a small group of people on the NBU's policy to curtail related-party lending practices that were wide-spread and frequently abused. These practices were primarily responsible for the nation's regularly occurring monetary misfortunes, such as sudden and steep currency devaluations and spikes in consumer-price inflation.

 

It was also thought at the time that if Trump won the presidential elections (highly uncertain in late October), Ukraine’s reformers would have incentive to redouble their efforts to lead Ukraine’s economic transition away from its unstable past.